Tai, I appreciate the link but you’ve ignored the discussion. It’s probable my argument has flaws but you’re drifting upwards into this ethereal plane of ethics that isn’t grounded in anything substantial. Bring forward evidence, history, data to support your argument. That’s the only chance you have to sway my perspective. This philosophy exercise is going to have us running in around in circles, chasing slippery concepts in an argument ungrounded in science. Not a good way to create solutions.